Former prime minister and member of the National Assembly Asif Zardari has challenged Supreme Court verdict on August 29, Asif Zardari has already passed before the case, assets under the law are now under the law. The old details can not be asked, only details can be sought under the election act, the Supreme Court will review its decisions.
According to media reports, PPP’s co-Chairman Asif Zardari has challenged a decision on NRO case. The Supreme Court had decided the NRO case verdict 29. Asif Zardari has filed a petition in the Supreme Court for the verdict of NROOOK. The petition filed in the petition filed by Asif Ali Zardari has been badly before the case.
Asif Zardari challenged the August 29 decision
Asking for details of assets from Asif Zardari, basic rights violations. No details of past assets of the person can be asked under the law. The details of property assets are requested only from the Election Commission. The Supreme Court has appealed to the Supreme Court to review its decision. According to the statement, the Supreme Court ordered the ten-year details of the transit and unacceptable property from the former President, declaring the oath submitted by former President Asif Ali Zardari on August 29, in reference to NRO. Also rejecting the statement of former President Pervez Musharraf and former Attorney General Malik Qayyum, besides asking for details of the names and assets of the wife and children, besides the indigenous and non-real estate property.
On August 29, a three-member bench comprising Justice Umar Ata Bandranal and Justice Ejazullah Hassan, headed by Justice Muhammad Saqib Nisar, hearing petition filed for action against the workers responsible for the loss of national treasury. On the occasion, the Chief Justice said that after taking the statement submitted by former president Asif Ali Zardari on Friday last, he said that it was unclear as saying that according to the statement, according to the tradition, these are the properties till today, This statement confirms that voluntary suspicion.
Asif Ali Zadriiri did not reveal his assets in Pakistan even in this statement, therefore the court directed the former president to submit the details of all the transit and non-real estate assets from 2007 to 2018. There is no other property through indirect, indirect or trust. The court ruled that former president, the details of his children and his late wife, Ms. Benazir Bhutto’s bank accounts, should also refer to the court.
During the hearing, Justice Omar Uttar Mandal said that there are many ways to hide property in the world, now the matter has reached the bit by dollar, people hide their names by means of their assets trust and off-noise companies. Ali Zaradri’s statement is not complete by the oath, he should clearly tell the court that he is not a property leader.
On hearing of former President’s lawyer Farooq H Naik during the hearing, the Chief Justice said that we do not want to test the former president, let us know the details of assets only, we want the national leader to continue your certificate for being successful and confidential. What to do Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said that the people of Pakistan have the right to know all the details about their leader.
During the hearing, the petitioner Farooq Shah Gilani said objections against Zulfiqar’s statement, saying that according to the statement, according to the statement, if there is no foreign and foreign property abroad in the country, then where 60 million dollars in Swiss accounts went to the former President The lawyer said that the cases have been carried out against their clients but were not proven, neither nine years have they been convicted, they should get some money, till the end they will face these old allegations, if If we submit something to the court today, another inquiry will begin, for the first three years, three cases have been passed.
The accused, who was in custody, told him that the Supreme Court could get the case in case of clearance, can not be dumped by remaining in prison for 9 years. Hameen should be told whether Asif Zardari in Kosovo Was it an account or not, Was Benazir Bhutto or there was an account on the name of children, Farooq H Naik said that he would know the court by looking at Asif Zardari.
The Chief Justice said that we do not want to prosecute the former president, the details should be given voluntarily to the court, if the former president does not know about his martyrdom bank accounts, in this regard the court should be informed in writing. That they do not know about it, we should also be told about bank accounts in Switzerland that they are.
During the hearing, former President Pervez Musharraf’s lawyer Akhtar Shah presented a non-certified statement in the court’s court, saying that his client has an apartment in Dubai, which is worth five million rupees worth four million rupees, thus in his property There are also three vehicles, including a mercedes car 2015 model, implant car 2018 model and the tiei jeep of the 2017 model.
Akhtar Shah further said that the National Bank of Pakistan’s Union Bank, 92 thousand dirham in Dubai’s account, and the United Bank has an account of £ 21,000 in London’s account, while there are shares of two lakh 68 thousand 653 Darma in Dana Gas, which the Justice said The court should be informed that Musharraf could flat up the salary of his life, his wife